Cryptome DVDs are offered by Cryptome. Donate $25 for two DVDs of the Cryptome 12-years collection of 46,000 files from June 1996 to June 2008 (~6.7 GB). Click Paypal or mail check/MO made out to John Young, 251 West 89th Street, New York, NY 10024. The collection includes all files of cryptome.org, jya.com, cartome.org, eyeball-series.org and iraq-kill-maim.org, and 23,000 (updated) pages of counter-intelligence dossiers declassified by the US Army Information and Security Command, dating from 1945 to 1985.The DVDs will be sent anywhere worldwide without extra cost.

Google
 
Web cryptome.org cryptome.info jya.com eyeball-series.org cryptome.cn


13 October 2008. Related:

http://cryptome.info/0001/osa-panic.htm (October 8, 2008)

http://cryptome.org/osa-wrong.pdf (September 23, 2008)

28 July 2008


Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:52:38 +0100
From: "Mike Smith" <parellic[at]googlemail.com>
Subject: For Cryptome, The Daniel James spy case

I just thought you would like to know that the message I sent you (below), and its appearance on Cryptome, has apparently caused enormous repercussions with the Prosecution team preparing the trial against Daniel James. I have learned that there is an investigation currently ongoing to discover how these witness statements leaked out. So, if you want to copy the post from my blog and save it on Cryptome, then please do so because there is a chance that the British authorities will attempt to have it removed from my blog.

Regards,

Mike Smith

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Mike Smith <parellic[at]googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:50 PM
Subject: For Cryptome, The Daniel James spy case

I have just printed some Witness Statements on my blog which the Prosecution withheld from the Defence for over a year. I believe that both these statements were made by members of the US Army working in Afghanistan:

http://parellic.blogspot.com/2008/07/corporal-daniel-james-faces-engineered.html


15 July 2008

Corporal Daniel James faces an engineered civilian trial

It was not until Daniel James appeared at the Old Bailey on 19 February 2008 that the Prosecution reluctantly disclosed more evidence. The Prosecution had been holding on to this undisclosed evidence for more than a year, and had taken the position that it would not help the Defence case. I respectfully disagree.

Now Daniel faces his trial in the Old Bailey on 2 October, and they have brought in a Welsh judge Sir David Roderick Evans to preside over the case, presumably because a provincial judge is more pliable and will bend to the Prosecution’s way of thinking. Mr Justice Roderick Evans’ main claims to fame seem to be his campaign for a prison in North Wales and that Welsh should be spoken in the Welsh Courts.

Last June I advised Daniel that he should demand that he goes before a Court Martial, but his request has been denied by the Attorney general, who thinks he should be treated as a civilian. No wonder the Crown Prosecution Service want control of this case because they know they can engineer an unfair trial for Daniel, as they did in my own case. The last thing the CPS wants is for Daniel to be tried by the Army, because he will get a fair trial before his peers, and the following statements show that Army people will come out in Daniel’s favour.

These are 2 of the previously undisclosed statements:

Witness Statements of Lieutenant Colonel Stocks
Taken on 2 February and 4 May 2007

I am presently in Afghanistan on Operation Herrick as Staff Officer Grade One Interpreters.

I assessed Cpl James as the best possible person to do that job based on his competency and linguistic experience. As a soldier I found him very easy to get on with. He was well turned out and quite deferential to rank. I would see him about once or twice a month when I visited Kabul. He did ask about promotion and I believe he should have been given acting rank to Sergeant because of his linguistic skills and he was qualified due to military courses held.

In my dealing with Corporal James he never once mentioned to me his religion, or any issues around bullying. He did however have an issue about not being promoted and this seemed to frustrate him - he seemed to feel that he had been passed over. I explained to him the problems within the Territorial Army (TA). I tried to address this situation. I spoke to the AGC SPS Major attached to the ARRC who dealt with soldiers’ career management. I took this action because I felt he was qualified and competent enough to be promoted and in his position as the General’s interpreter I felt he deserved the rank of Acting Sergeant. I also assisted Corporal James in applying and completing his application for language exams, which would allow him to obtain a pay rise, which I felt he deserved.

When I visited ISAF HQ I came into contact with Corporal James approximately twice a month and discussed various issues around work matters and interpreting issues. I felt that Cpl James was well suited for his role and got a great deal of personal satisfaction from his job role. At the time he was the best qualified person in the role and he never discussed with me any of the conversations or translating work he had done with the General. In regard to my comment that I was astounded when I heard that he had been arrested I base this statement on the fact that Cpl James always came across as an extremely professional soldier.

Witness Statement of Major Blackmore
Taken on 1st February 2007

I am currently posted to the Allied Rapid Reaction Corps Support Battalion. I arrived at ISAF HQ in Kabul as Officer Commanding 14th Transport Squadron. As Deputy Commander of HQ Support Group I have additional responsibility for oversight of morale, welfare and activities on camp.

I came to know Cpl James directly in two distinct roles: firstly as a result of his involvement with ‘salsa’ classes on the camp and more importantly through using him on a number of occasions as an interpreter in relation to a school’s project that the Battalion had come to sponsor. He assisted me in all resultant dealings with the Headmaster, local elders, and miscellaneous local contractors/suppliers. It is my belief that Cpl James accompanied me on visits to the school on at least 4 occasions. On 18th 2006 after local contractors had first levelled the site, arrangements were made for a detachment of military personnel from ISAF to attend and erect between 18 and 20 heavy-duty tents purchased with money raised on the camp.

I recall him intervening on my behest at one point. It had not been possible to erect a number of the tents as intended because the ground had not been cleared for levelling by the contractors. We were worried that if left on site, these extra tents might possibly be stolen or sold because of the impoverished state that the local people found themselves living in. Cpl James stepped forward and spoke on my behalf to make the point that the people must ensure that this did not happen. I think he told them that we would be back to check up on them. Everyone was happy and I was personally very impressed by the manner in which he conducted himself.

On 19th October 2006 we returned to the site. The school was now open as a result of our efforts the previous day and the tents that we had been unable to erect were still intact. A large group of local people had gathered to inspect what had been done for them. Everyone was very excited. Cpl James himself was effusive he told me that the people were thanking him over and over again saying people have promised and promised in the past but you have delivered. A t one point as we were still at the school site, I remember looking to one side and seeing Cpl James in the process of handing a bundle of cash (possibly US dollars) to a local female. I immediately called out to him and said “Corporal James, what are you doing?” He replied “Sir, it’s only 65 dollars, she has 6 children” and then went on to add “it’s salsa fund, Sir” before finishing by saying “I help, I help where I can”.

The female in question was overwhelmed by such generosity and grabbed Cpl James by the hand. She then spoke to him evidently to express her gratitude. It was clearly a very emotional experience for both of them. I feel that it is safe to say that staff, pupils, parents and everyone else involved with the Saddudin Ansari School were totally overwhelmed. Local media coverage was also present and this served to project a very positive image of ISAF which no doubt contributed to overall efforts to win over the “hearts and minds” of the Afghan people as a whole. From what I had seen of him in action at the school, I would say however that the way he interacted with those we met was without exception excellent. He was animated, succeeded in winning the trust of the people, had them all smiling and was clearly passionate about what we were doing. He was in my view perfect for the role that I needed him for.

In my experience, Corporal James was always very positive about the role of ISAF and the assistance that was being rendered to the Afghan people. At no time did we discuss the current situation in Iraq or political opinions in general.

More details of this school project are available in the ARRC Journal of Spring 2007 at page 34 of the pdf document.

So why am I putting this information on my blog, and why is it relevant to me and anyone else facing a serious trial in the UK?

The statements above are a good example of the way that Crown Prosecutors can improve their chances of securing a conviction. They protect the Prosecution case by not disclosing anything which could help the Defence, and it is quite clear on reading the above statements that they do in fact help Daniel James, and go a long way towards showing the sort of person he really is.

British Justice is not open and fair, rather it is a secret operation where biased people can concoct their case from all the evidence available, and then decide what crumbs they will throw to the Defence. The Prosecution in my own case hid vital evidence from my Defence, and in so doing were able to secure a conviction based on lies.

The tragedy is that the British Public appears to believe that our Justice System is fair, and that it convicts only the guilty. The truth is that the jury has no idea what goes outside a courtroom, because Justice in Britain is administered by barristers, Police and judges who are both dishonest and corrupt.

NB My previous posts on the subject of Daniel James can be found below:

Soldier Daniel James Official Secrets spy case

Army interpreter Corporal Daniel James - Iranian spy?

Fair Deal for Daniel James?

Compare Daniel James spy case to Milos Stankovic

Daniel James wants to go before a Court Martial

Daniel James prepares to make his plea

Disinformation about Daniel James

Official Secrets Act Section 1 cases

Press Complaints Commission & Espionage

ARRSE ARmy Rumour SErvice Moderators

Daniel James spy trial is due to start tomorrow

Daniel James spy trial delay, no ARRSE support

3 Comments:

At 10:10 PM,  amanfromMars said...
Michael,

It is a Disgraceful Scar upon Military Command that they have Capitulated to Civilian Censure of Special Forces in Mobilised and Motivated Personnel .... Natural Stars.

And for Defence not to be able to read and know of the Specific Indictment[s] which Drive the Prosecution, is a Blatant Abuse and MisCarriage of Justice and surely a Crime itself, for which the System can be legitimately Charged and called to Defend itself when Prosecuted for that Executive MisUse.
 
At 5:05 AM,  Anonymous said...
I know Danny and he screwed a lot of people over.. He legal team have requested statements from me, as they claim he passed photos to somebody whilst in holland..
 
At 6:13 AM,  mjs said...
All the people who have written to me about Danny have said he is a nice guy and everybody seemed to like him. So I find it a bit suspicious that you say he "screwed a lot of people".

As far as Danny's trial is concerned, the prosecution must prove that Danny communicated material to another for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the State. If any photos were sent to Holland, then the prosecution will have to prove that Danny actually sent them, and that they were prejudicial to the UK.